Software » Campo

h1. Bringup

There has to be a bringup application which uses the bringup class from campo.

At least the bringup application is able to write the hwinfo via gdb scripts.

* The result is an protocol that should be added to the hw repository. "doc/bringup_0.1.x.txt". 

The bringup class shall dump the protocoll after the interactive communication.

* Defects are created

* The readme is enhanced by possible erratas with defect id when the reason is clear. (meanwhile fixed biwak problem)

h2. Architecture

<pre><code class="cpp">

class CBringup

{

   CList<CResult> results;

}

class CWriter

{

   CList<CResult> &results;

   void printSystemInfo();

   void printTests();

   void printSummary();

   void generateProtokol();

}

int CBringup::testAssert(const char *test)

{

   CResult &result=( results << CResult(test) );

   result.setGroup(getGroup());

}

int CBringup::testRtc(CRtc &rtc)

{

   setGroup("RTC");

   testAssert("plausibility", rtc.getDate() > 2010, rtc.getDate() );

   return(sta);

}

</code></pre>

h2. Alternative

Keeping CBringup more generic and using inheritance for tests.

This will create a lot of overhead for all splitted classes.

<pre><code class="cpp">

CBringup

{

   CList <CTest *> tests;

}

CTest

{

   const char *topic;

   CList <CResult> results;

   run() = 0;

}

CResult

{

   const char *issue;

   EResult result;

}

main()

{

   CPlatform *pPlatform=new CPlatform();

   CBringup bringup( eRtc |  

                     eUsb | eUart | eOutputs

   );

   bringup.addTest( new CTestRtc( pPlatform->m_rtc1 ) );

   bringup.addTest( new CTestUsb( pPlatform->m_usb1 ) );

   CWriterMd writer( bringup );

}

CTestRtc::run()

{

}

</code></pre>